Scholarly research advances by making, evaluating and building-on attributable “assertions”.
The most comprehensive way to register research assertions is by publishing articles in peer review journals. This “jerky” approach remains the gold standard for research progress.
However, traditional forms of publication can now be supplemented with more dynamic and nimble approaches that are based on the “creepy” publication of granular assertions. Such assertions are equally attributable but offer significant advantages in terms of speed, cost, and flexibility.
In this session we’ll discuss the relationship between PIDs and assertions, and explore how they can be deployed by jerks and creeps. Learn how the emerging PID infrastructure enables a more incremental and granular approach.